Featured Post
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Friday, October 19, 2018
What, be a servant ? No way ! (Mk 10:35-45)
Jesus gives a challenging
instruction to his disciples when he tells them that they must be servants to
all. If they want to be first, they must
be last. Today we do not usually aspire
to be last, let alone a servant, for we tend to think of such a position as low
paid and demeaning. Being a servant goes
too much against the cultural and political grain of today. And yet, this is the precise role that Jesus
calls for in his instruction to the disciples. If we are to follow his
counsel, we must make sense of what being a servant means in today’s milieu
that emphasizes autonomy and self-determination as the touchstones of
independence.
Jesus himself provides the
answer when he declares that “the Son of Man did not come to be served but to
serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.” Jesus is the Divine Word who created the
entire universe, and yet, humbled himself to share in our humanity as servant
to all. His guide and measure in his
mission of service is love for the children of God.
Isaiah clearly revealed the
heart of love as service to others when he says of the Lord, “This…is the
fasting that I wish: releasing those bound unjustly…setting free the oppressed,
breaking every yoke; sharing your bread with the hungry, sheltering the
oppressed and the homeless; clothing the naked when you see them, and not
turning your back on your own (Is 58:6-7).
This conduct follows a principle of love that applies to all of us.
Jesus appeals to this same
principle of love when he addresses the issue of wealth in many of his
parables. In these parables, Jesus does
not condemn the possession of wealth.
Rather, he insists that wealth must be shared with those in need. Jesus wants us to care about what happens to
those around us with real love and support, especially with respect to the
poor.
Care for the poor is the
central theme of the U.S. Bishops’ pastoral letter, Economic Justice for All.
Although published many years ago in 1986, their appeal remains relevant
and just as urgent today. In their
letter, the Bishops present and defend economic standards based on biblical
norms and the social justice teaching of the Church. The bishops rely on that tradition to affirm
the moral principle that “all members of society have a special obligation to
the poor and vulnerable.” They note that
this “preferential option for the poor” does not mean pitting one group against
another, but rather, strengthening the whole community by assisting those who
are most vulnerable (EJ n. 16).
The bishops conclude that,
“As Christians, we are called to respond to the needs of all our brothers and
sisters, but those with the greatest needs require the greatest response” (EJ
n. 16). Therefore, the “invisible poor” must not be marginalized in society or
in societal consciousness. Neither should a “preferential option for the poor”
be invisible in guiding social policy, nor a marginalized principle in the
consciousness of Christians.
The Church continues to pursue
this goal in a special way today through its missionary work across the world. For
this reason, Pope Pius XI instituted World
Mission Sunday in 1926 to be celebrated each year on this Sunday. This designation calls attention to clinics
caring for the sick and dying, orphanages providing a place of safety and
shelter, and schools offering education from kindergarten through high school. The
collection for World Mission Sunday also goes to fund seminaries preparing
candidates for the priesthood and support for other religious formation
programs. This missionary work takes place in over one thousand dioceses
throughout the world, mostly in Africa and Asia. In these missions, the poor receive education
and health care while experiencing the loving heart of our Lord.
This missionary work flows
from the instruction that Jesus gave to his disciples long ago. Today that instruction challenges us to
uphold a different vision of life than most would find acceptable. Jesus outlines the parameters of that vision
with his focus on love and service. For
Jesus, a person’s worth is not determined by appearance or income or ethnic
background or citizenship status.
Rather, each person is the image and likeness of God and thus has worth
as a sacred gift of God. With many
parables about wealth and service, Jesus reminds us that the values of the
kingdom—compassion, justice, mercy and care for the least of his beloved—are
not arbitrary values agreed upon by politicians and sociologists. These are holy commands from the One who
created us.
Jesus showed us how to fulfill
this holy command to love and serve.
And, Paul appeals to this model when he says of Jesus, “For we do not
have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who
has similarly been tested in every way, yet without sin. So, let us confidently
approach the throne of grace to receive mercy and to find grace for timely
help” (Heb 4:14-16). Paul makes this appeal because he knows that Jesus is
anxious to show us how to be servant to all.
Jesus knows what it takes. He simply asks that we follow in his
footsteps.
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
Who am I? (Mk 8:27-35)
One time as they walk along Jesus asks his disciples two very
different questions. Both seem very
ordinary, but the second poses a serious challenge that compels a choice on
their part. The first question about who others are saying Jesus is compels very
little from the disciples beyond their reporting the known facts, much like
reporting the results of a political poll.
Their answer about who others think Jesus is reveals nothing about what
the disciples themselves believe about who Jesus is. Nor does the question require any commitment
to Jesus or to his way of life.
The second question, on the other
hand, seems just as ordinary but turns out to be challenging and the disciples’
response revealing. This second question—who do YOU say that I am—is also a bit
mysterious because by this time the disciples had a fairly good idea of who
Jesus is based on what they saw him do.
They saw the large crowds gather as
he went around teaching. They were there
when Jesus fed the people with a few loaves of bread. They witnessed his
challenge to the overbearing authority and hypocrisy of the Pharisees. They saw how deeply Jesus cared for the poor
and the oppressed and went out of his way to include sinners and outcasts in
his inner circle of friends. So, why on earth did Jesus ask them such a
question?
Jesus knows that his time with the
disciples is nearing an end and thus they must decide who they believe Jesus is
once and for all. The question therefore
prods some level of commitment from the disciples right then and there. From
this point on, the disciples can no longer remain aloof. They must decide what they personally believe
about who Jesus is, and their answer will establish who they are in relation to
Jesus. The question thus calls for a commitment to Jesus and a determination of
a relationship with him.
Had the disciples remained aloof,
they would have answered his question based only on what Jesus did. But, they knew because Jesus had shown them
that a person is always more than the sum of what he or she does. Parents are more than bread winners, grass
cutters, house cleaners, cooks, chauffeurs, and disciplinarians. Children are more than students, sports
players, budding musicians, and consumers of parental resources. We are always more than “Do-er’s; We are “Be-ers”.
Likewise, Jesus is more than the
sum of what He does. That’s why he
asks: Who do you say that I AM? When Peter says, “you are the Christ,” he is
saying from his heart: You are the Anointed One of God. In this way, Peter affirms that Jesus is in
relationship with God, and that this relationship is the essence of who Jesus
is; the essence of his being. If Jesus
is in relationship with God, then so are the disciples.
This mutual relationship is what
motivates Jesus to teach the disciples to begin their prayer with the words,
“Our Father.” This greeting shows the
disciples that they too are in relationship with the Father and with each
other, just as Jesus is in relationship with the Father and with them. Thus, the disciples are also in relationship
with Jesus as brothers and sisters.
The same applies to us as
well. We too are in relationship with
God our Father and with each other, and in relationship with Jesus, our
brother, and he with us. This is who we
are; this relationship is the essence of our being. Thus, when we answer the
question Jesus asks—who do you say I am?—we also answer the question—who am
I? Our answer reveals who we are in
relation to Jesus and in relation to each other.
Jesus asks the disciples these
questions while times are good to prepare them for the bad times ahead. Later, the disciples will have no time for
reflection. In this sense, Jesus tries
to convey the urgency of Isaiah’s warning to “Seek the LORD while he may be
found, call him while he is near” (Is 55:6).
Jesus knows that his disciples will need to rely on more than what
others say about Him in order to get through the tough times ahead. The disciples will need their own personal
commitment to Jesus and faith in him and in each other to overcome the
challenges and threats that are about to unfold.
Jesus asks the same two questions
of us for the same reason. The answer to
the first question may be easy enough as it was for the disciples. Our answer to the second question is likewise
as revealing for us as it was for the early disciples. Our answer reveals who we believe Jesus is
and who we believe we are in relation to him and to each other. It is a question that we cannot avoid however
we choose to answer.
Wednesday, July 11, 2018
Hitting the mark (Mk 6:7-13)
The choice is theirs. Mark’s Gospel does not provide
many details about the journey taken by the Twelve at the instruction of Jesus. We only know that he gives them authority
over unclean spirits and sends them on their way with instructions about what
to pack and where to stay—or not, depending on the hospitality they
receive. The specifics of what they are
to do on their journey Jesus apparently leaves up to them. The choice is theirs.
By their own account, the Twelve choose to follow the
example of Jesus. They bring healing to
others in spirit and in body. They
preach repentance. They drive out
demons. They cure the sick. These are the chief means of Jesus and how the
Twelve heal others and restore them to life, both spiritually and physically. Healing is the mission of Jesus himself. Jesus came to call sinners to repentance (Lk 5:32), so that we may have life and have it
abundantly (Jn 10:10). Jesus thus calls
attention to the joy in heaven over one sinner who repents (Lk 15:7).
Repentance involves the renunciation of sin. The
Greek word for sin in the New Testament is amartia, which means “to miss the
mark.” We miss the mark when we imitate
false gods rather than the true God of Love.
In this sense, sin is not a matter of breaking rules. Rather, sin is an orientation in one direction
as opposed to another. Sin is a turning away from God to a reliance
on things, a false god. There are many false gods.
Repentance is the very opposite. Repentance is a reorientation, a turning away
from sin and turning back to God. In this
sense, repentance is a two-step process.
The first step is to turn away from our false god, while the second step
is to turn back to the true God, the real God.
Because the goal of repentance is forgiveness, it is not enough to say,
“I’m sorry.” Genuine repentance requires
both steps. If our regret motivates us
to turn back to God, we can be sure that God’s forgiveness follows.
Most of us tend to think of
repentance and forgiveness as a single moment in time, rather than as a process. We express sorrow for the wrong we have done,
and then act as though feeling sorry is enough.
We expect forgiveness to follow.
But repentance is not just about feeling sorry. The essence of repentance is transformation. To repent means to turn away from sin and
turn back to God. Repentance begins with
an individual choice but it is a process that in some cases takes time.
Seeking human forgiveness
can also be a process that takes time.
This includes the process of forgiving ourselves. Once we express sorrow, especially to the one
we have wronged, we expect to be forgiven by that person. We act as though our expression of sorrow
somehow entitles us to forgiveness. Yet,
the reality is that forgiveness is not automatic because it is not just an
individual choice. Human forgiveness is
a mutual process that involves at least two persons—the one who does the wrong
and seeks forgiveness, and the one wronged who is asked to forgive.
As a result, forgiveness can
take time for both the one who does wrong and for the one who forgives because
transformation—the second step—can take time.
This is true because forgiveness often requires genuine sorrow as well
as a track record to show that such sorrow is in fact sincere. We cannot fool ourselves or others with words
alone. At times we must demonstrate that
our repentance has indeed led to genuine transformation. And that often takes time. Thus, forgiveness does not necessarily happen
all at once as an automatic response to our expression of sorrow and asking for
forgiveness. Rather, forgiveness is a
mutual process that more often happens over time.
Mark’s Gospel does not
provide any details about how the healing that comes from repentance and
forgiveness takes place. Such lack of details
perhaps illustrates that Scripture is not a narrative about rules and formulas,
but a story that invites participation in the healing mission of Jesus. As
participants in the healing mission of Jesus, sometimes we seek healing and sometimes
we offer healing. The good news of Jesus is the possibility that our lives
might become an expression of his love and mercy. The Holy Spirit reveals to us
that our real humanity—the person we are called to be—can reflect the true
humanity of Christ.
When this happens, we can
experience faith as a process of transformation, a journey of healing. We often do not know beforehand the details
of how and when that healing will take place.
But like the Twelve sent by Jesus, we can be sure that healing will occur
if we but imitate Jesus. The choice is
ours.
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
A wife and the big picture (Mk 12:18-27)
The Sadducees did not believe in resurrection because they
did not believe in an afterlife. From
their perspective, the idea of resurrection is contrary to Scripture and leads
to irrational, absurd consequences. They
were also aware that Jesus did believe in both resurrection and an
afterlife. For that reason, they looked
for an opportunity to engage Jesus in a discussion. Their aim was to expose him as a false
teacher by proving that resurrection is an untenable belief. Mark’s gospel records one such encounter.
The strategy of the Sadducees is to pose a question based
on a passage found in the Book of Deuteronomy.
That passage specifies a man’s duty to the wife of his deceased brother
(Dt 25:5). If the doctrine of the resurrection
is true, then the woman having seven husbands at the resurrection is contrary
to Scripture. Or else, having to choose
which of the seven would be her husband leads to absurd and irrational
consequences. This dilemma suggests that
the doctrine is therefore false. Thus,
the question the Sadducees pose is meant to put Jesus in an embarrassing
position.
If he denies the necessity of the practice called for in
the Book of Deuteronomy, he avoids the absurd consequences suggested by the
question, but in effect denies the truth of Scripture. This would undermine his credibility and
authority to teach the reality of the resurrection, and thus undermine the
doctrine itself. On the other hand, if
Jesus denies that there is indeed a future state where such absurd consequences
occur, then he denies resurrection outright.
Either way, the Sadducees prove their point that resurrection is an
untenable and false doctrine.
Once again, however, Jesus turns the table on his
interrogators. He points out that their
question relies on a false premise.
Their question assumes that resurrection means a return to a state much
like the present one with similar circumstances. For Jesus, this amounts to comparing apples
to oranges. Instead, Jesus makes it
clear that life in the spiritual realm is not like life in the physical
realm. In the spiritual realm, there is
no need for marriage.
As a result, the Sadducees’ use of one passage from the
Book of Deuteronomy to disprove resurrection was a misuse of Scripture. Relying on one passage to prove a point often
leads to a distortion of Scripture. This
was the tactic used by Satan who quoted from Scripture for his own purpose when
he tempted Jesus in the desert. At the
very least, selecting one passage to prove a point reflects an uncritical
approach to Scripture and a failure to understand its purpose. It is in this respect that the Sadducees were
greatly misled. When it comes to reading
Scripture, they failed to get the big picture.
The Sadducees failed to understand
that Scripture reveals and explains the relationship between God and his
people. The purpose is to inspire and
lead us to the truth about God and his plan for our salvation. As the Apostle John puts it, ultimately the
purpose of Scripture is that we come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the
Son of God, and that through this belief we may have life in his name (Jn
20:31). That was true for the Sadducees
long ago as much as it is true for us today.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)